|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
Forums28
Topics3,983
Posts19,061
Members1,018
|
Most Online238 Feb 9th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: spinnaker pole
[Re: zeppo]
#10235
09/10/10 08:31 PM
09/10/10 08:31 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 111 Bellevue, WA, USA
R II
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 111
Bellevue, WA, USA
|
Here is a link to the Frequently Used Measurements page on this site. Posting to this 'Pacific NW Dist' forum only reaches those of us within the district. Posting to the general forum will widen your potential response.
AC
|
|
|
Re: spinnaker pole
[Re: zeppo]
#10239
09/11/10 07:49 AM
09/11/10 07:49 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,668 Portsmouth, RI
Rhapsody #348
Past J/30 Class President
|
Past J/30 Class President
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,668
Portsmouth, RI
|
Back to your original question if the pole was class legal. The J/30 Class Rules, section 5.11 and sub-paragraphs list the requirements that you can check it against. Basic physical dimensions, materiel and end fitting types are specified. The bridal requirements were dropped in a 2005 rules update, so whatever you have should be ok.
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
35
guests, and 1
spider. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|