1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums28
Topics3,984
Posts19,069
Members1,019
|
Most Online238 Feb 9th, 2024
|
|
|
The J/30 Class Association has partnered with West Marine and is now a member of the West Marine affiliate program. You can support the J/30 Class when you make your West Marine purchases online. The J/30 Class Association receives a percentage of sales from your purchases when you click through from our website. Click the logo above and you will be directed to the West Marine website with a cookie that identifies you as a J/30 affiliate. You can also use any discounts that you may be authorized.
|
|
Re: Spin Pole Track
#4601
05/03/00 10:22 AM
05/03/00 10:22 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 104 Lake Stevens, WA, USA
Alan Grim
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 104
Lake Stevens, WA, USA
|
This is an interesting thread. The question has been raised before with a similar answer. Bringing the track down to the deck is illegal. I personally like having the pole on the mast. It really doesnt stick out that far since its only J+1. It doesnt even make it past the bow pulpit. Plus, there appears to be photo evidence that this was allowed in a previous J30 NA championship regatta. See the pictures of Cat Came Back. http://paw.com/sail/j30/97NAs/cat_mk.jpg http://paw.com/sail/j30/97NAs/spins.jpg The first one shows a shirtless young foredecker sliding the pole up from the deck for a rounding. The second shows the pole clearly attached to the mast and on the deck. It looks like its sticking out pretty far but you'll notice that it is out to the side exaggerating the distance. This position would protect the forestay, addressing one of Bob's concerns. Did Cat Came Back get away with something or are we looking at a presidence?
|
|
|
Re: Spin Pole Track
#4603
05/03/00 12:06 PM
05/03/00 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 678 Maryland, USA
Bob Rutsch
Governor at Large
|
Governor at Large
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 678
Maryland, USA
|
Good evidence, especially the second picture. Sailors like to tinker/improve their boats to make them faster and/or easier to sail. Over time, class members must evaluate the degree to which they want to customize their boats and how willing they are to accept differences while still feeling that class rules provide for fair and even racing. Hull #2 surely differs from #545; both sail in the same fleet. This is a question I ponder and am forced to deal with all the time as a class officer. There is a broad array of views within our class. It is tough to turn a boat away from a championship because of some item out of spec with rules, especially when it is not obvious if an item was a factory option. The spin pole track is a perfect example, but I could quickly name a dozen others. Once you let a boat race have you set a precedent? This problem is exacerbated in the J/30 Class by twenty years time and the fact that most boats race PHRF (or cruise) with out regard to rules. This topic probably deserves its own thread_
|
|
|
Re: Spin Pole Track
#4604
05/03/00 03:05 PM
05/03/00 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 116 RI
Bob Rude
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
RI
|
As former officer and national commodore of the Ensign Class Association, these are the type of issues we were forced to rule on at nearly every regional or national regatta. By and large, the stance we took is that if a modification to the boat hadn't been formally approved in the class rules, the owner ran the risk of a) not being allowed to sail in the championship or b) could sail if the modification was removed or rendered unusable. If the later was the case, and the skipper persisted in using the device in the regatta, he/she would be disqualified. Obviously, there will always be some gray areas that are open to interpretation. Why take a chance, though? Specifically, I'm thinking of the discussion that's been going on regarding spinnaker numbers. Sailmakers don't make the rules. The organization does. So, why take a chance and attend a regatta with the chance that you'll be red flagged or not allowed to use the sail. When you enter an event, you should focus on the SAILING, not the legal stuff that may put you in a corner and distract your focus.
|
|
|
Re: Spin Pole Track
#4605
05/04/00 03:59 PM
05/04/00 03:59 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 124 New York, NY, USA
dwl
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 124
New York, NY, USA
|
So, what is the "legal" bottom of the spin pole track? Our track (on hull 003, with as far as we know, the orginal stick) comes down to about four or six inches from the deck. (I'll measure it on Saturday) We routinely just lower the pole down to deck level on the leeward rounding, and have never had a problem. (And we have placed a mark on the mast for how far up the mast the pole needs to go, to clear things when swapping from side to side, when cleaning things up. )
- David Levine (J/30 003, 22604 "Youthful Indiscretion")
|
|
|
Re: Spin Pole Track
#4607
05/05/00 10:05 AM
05/05/00 10:05 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 232 Belleville, IL, USA
Mark
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 232
Belleville, IL, USA
|
On Foghorn (hull #62) I am certain that the stick is original and so is the track which also comes down to within approximately 6 inches of the deck. It is the curved track same as mentioned above which is riveted to the mast. We also preset the pole at the bottom of the track especially for short buoy courses and just tack the jib over the top. It sounds like maybe J/Boats may have made a change sometime during the production life (just as with cockpits, interior, etc.). I would think that the class rules should accomodate the differing configurations supplied by the manufacturer.
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
36
guests, and 1
spider. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|