|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
Forums28
Topics3,983
Posts19,061
Members1,018
|
Most Online238 Feb 9th, 2024
|
|
|
The J/30 Class Association has partnered with West Marine and is now a member of the West Marine affiliate program. You can support the J/30 Class when you make your West Marine purchases online. The J/30 Class Association receives a percentage of sales from your purchases when you click through from our website. Click the logo above and you will be directed to the West Marine website with a cookie that identifies you as a J/30 affiliate. You can also use any discounts that you may be authorized.
|
|
Re: Wooden blocks at the partners
[Re: Russ Atkinson]
#7470
06/10/09 11:59 AM
06/10/09 11:59 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 190 Atlanta, GA, USA
whitedolphin
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 190
Atlanta, GA, USA
|
I recently went through this and found that the previous owner used small rectangular pieces of starboard.
On the sides, the pieces run horizontally, and at the fore/aft, they are smaller bits that run up and down.
I cant tell if he planed them down, or just used different thicknesses, but the end result is really nice. Since the starboard bends, the mast is supported at the partners by a wide surface area instead of smaller shims; could prolly do the same with wood, but starboard isn't going to rot.
As it turned out, he got the mast to the prescribed location, and nice and straight, so I didn't have to change anything.
This may be a bit of overkill, but is definitely a slick way of doing it.
-dan
|
|
|
Re: Wooden blocks at the partners
[Re: Russ Atkinson]
#7474
06/10/09 03:09 PM
06/10/09 03:09 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,668 Portsmouth, RI
Rhapsody #348
Past J/30 Class President
|
Past J/30 Class President
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,668
Portsmouth, RI
|
Russ - I don't know if it is "good" or "bad", but do know that I center the mast before starting the adjustment of uppers and lowers. This from the UK Tuning Guide..... 2) Remove partner blocks and center mast with upper shrouds. Use the main halyard to equi-distant points on either rail as a guide. Take-up on the lowers just enough to keep the lower mast in column with the top (hand tight). 3) The mast step should be maximum forward (so that the forward edge of the mast is 25mm aft of the forward vertical face of the molded step in the sole liner. Block mast in front, pushing it as far aft as possible in the partners. This will reduce prebend in the lower mast sections. 4) Adjust wooden blocks so as to fit snugly on either side of the mast partners. Shimming and/or planning may be necessary, as there is a good chance that the mast will not be perfectly centered in the partners. ......
|
|
|
Re: Wooden blocks at the partners
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#7482
06/12/09 12:06 PM
06/12/09 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 393 Rockwood, MI, USA
Russ Atkinson
OP
Senior Member
|
OP
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 393
Rockwood, MI, USA
|
I tune the mast the same way: 1) Mast step forward, forestay at max length, center the mast tip using a halyard, etc We do not however, block the mast in front pushing it aft as far as possible. But my guess is that if you crank down on the uppers before you block the mast from the front, the pre-bend is already in the mast from mast tip to step and you won't take it out from the partners down to the mast step by blocking in front of the mast. By blocking the mast from the front after tuning, one might reduce mast bend below the partners when applying backstay tension. Is my thinking wrong?
|
|
|
Re: Wooden blocks at the partners
[Re: Bob Rutsch]
#7485
06/15/09 12:53 PM
06/15/09 12:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186 Barrington, RI
cstoddard
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Barrington, RI
|
The J is actually 11' 6" +/-1/2" (3505mm +/- 13mm) I recommend setting this at Max which will give you max rake in the rig thus better up wind performance. I set mine up 10 years ago with Spartite it was well worth the money rig has been in and out at least four times with no damage to the spartite plus almost no leaks at the deck when it rains !
Charlie Stoddard fleet 13 measurer
Charlie Stoddard Falcon #229
|
|
|
Re: Wooden blocks at the partners
[Re: ]
#7637
07/28/09 11:22 AM
07/28/09 11:22 AM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5 Freeport, ME
togwotee
Forum Newbie
|
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Freeport, ME
|
I have a question on the mast partners... I have hull #4 and by the looks of things, the partners were changed at some point between my hull and more recent hulls. My partners are very large and I have layered plywood carved out in the shape of the mast in place of wedges.
If you haven't seen it, there's literally 2" forward and aft and probably an inch on either side. I've been trying to tune the rig to reduce some of the wicked weather helm, but "block the mast as far aft as possible in the partners" is a useless statement. I have the mast nearly centered in the larger, rectangular partners.
I have the step plate set around 1" aft of the vertical in the head, making the mast closer to 2" aft. If anything, moving the foot of the mast further aft, thus moving the head of the mast forward, would reduce weather helm right?
I have a roller furling on the boat, but the headstay without the sail is snug, but not real tight. The backstay is tight when the turnbuckles are almost all the way down, and cap shrouds are around 45, lowers around 44.
I will take some measurements, but the mast is raked probably 2" with maybe 1-2" of pre-bend.
Any thoughts? Thanks.
Kyle
|
|
|
Re: Wooden blocks at the partners
[Re: togwotee]
#7640
07/28/09 12:48 PM
07/28/09 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 678 Maryland, USA
Bob Rutsch
Governor at Large
|
Governor at Large
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 678
Maryland, USA
|
The early hulls have a much larger hole in the deck for the mast. I figure J/Boats had not yet figured out how they were going to set the rig up. Most of the racing tune suggestions have to do with reducing lee helm by having more rake, inducing more weather helm, thus step forward, headstay max. Your rig sounds plenty tight, the question is do you have enough weight on the rail for the amount of sail area you have up. Several times over the past month we have raced Wed nights with five people and well under 1000 lbs. Keeping the boat flat makes a big difference beating and can help reaching. If you don't have max weight then you must drop the traveler down, put backstay on, or use less sail area.
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
48
guests, and 13
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|