|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
Forums28
Topics3,945
Posts18,946
Members1,002
|
Most Online223 Dec 17th, 2019
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#10438
11/01/10 03:23 PM
11/01/10 03:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186 Barrington, RI
cstoddard
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Barrington, RI
|
Been watching this thread for a couple of days It is my recollection that the bridles were left off the 2004 rules by error aluminum poles will require bridles due the stress loads I think Carbon poles would be fine with a D ring when running down wind in the higher wind conditions but I would have concerns as to the loading when beam reaching. Tapered poles which our rules do not allow for are can be built with D rings. I will check with a couple of the pole manufacturers and get there views on the D rings for carbon poles
Trigger ends were not allowed due to the fact they are not retrofitable to the old poles.
Charlie Stoddard Falcon #229
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: sailon]
#11128
02/21/11 04:42 PM
02/21/11 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186 Barrington, RI
cstoddard
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Barrington, RI
|
I am in the process of reseaching the history on this and will have a ruling shortly
Charlie Class measurer
Charlie Stoddard Falcon #229
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: cstoddard]
#18985
04/25/22 05:22 PM
04/25/22 05:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88 Belmont, MA
Georges
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88
Belmont, MA
|
Thanks Charlie, Did you end-up with a ruling on this. I see that the bridle was added explicitly in 2004 - 5.11.3. Was removed in 2005 edition - and not figuring in the latest one from 2013.
I am planning to invest in a carbon pole, the 12.5' still sold by defender, but this one does not have a bridle. Want to check first if it is class legal....
Thanks!
-- Georges Foot Loose #467 - CPYC - Winthrop
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#18987
04/25/22 09:10 PM
04/25/22 09:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88 Belmont, MA
Georges
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88
Belmont, MA
|
Thanks fort this quick answer Bill - much appreciated!
-- Georges Foot Loose #467 - CPYC - Winthrop
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
40
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|