|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
Forums28
Topics3,945
Posts18,946
Members1,002
|
Most Online223 Dec 17th, 2019
|
|
|
Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
#8182
10/28/09 12:59 PM
10/28/09 12:59 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,661 Portsmouth, RI
Rhapsody #348
OP
Past J/30 Class President
|
OP
Past J/30 Class President
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,661
Portsmouth, RI
|
There is a discussion about spinnaker poles in another thread at at this link where Michael Lusty found in the 2004 rules the requirement for a bridle was added. In 2005 when the class rules were updated to allow carbon poles, the bridal requirement disappeared. Bob Rutsch commented that he did not know if this was intentional, or an inadvertent omission when the rules updates were made. Here are the applicable paragraphs from the 2004 and 2005 rules: 2004 Rules5.11 Spinnaker Pole .1 Material shall be of aluminum alloy extrusion and supplied only through a builder approved by the J/30 Class Association. .2 Length from tip to tip of the pole shall not exceed 3810 mm nor when attached to the fitting at the mast, extend more than 3842 mm from the face of the mast. .3 Bridle is required and the material is not restricted..4 Spinnaker pole end fittings can be of composite material such as the Forespar "ultra" series. A trigger mechanisms for holding the jaws open is not permitted.2005 Rules & as currently worded in 2009 Rules5.11 Spinnaker Pole .1 Material shall be of either aluminum alloy extrusion or carbon fiber. The diameter of the an aluminum spinnaker pole shall not be less than 2 7/8 inches and a carbon fiber spinnaker pole shall have a uniform diameter through out of not be less than 2 1/2 inches..2 Length from tip to tip of the pole shall not exceed 3810 mm nor when attached to the fitting at the mast, extend more than 3842 mm from the face of the mast. .3 Spinnaker pole end fittings can be of composite material such as the Forespar "ultra" series. A trigger mechanisms for holding the jaws open is not permitted. Would the class measurer please investigate this and report back here? If it was removed intentionally, then the case is closed. If it was inadvertently dropped during the 2005 rules update, we should restore the rule as intended during the next time the rules are updated.
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Upda
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#8187
10/29/09 04:23 PM
10/29/09 04:23 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 649 Marblehead, MA
dbows
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 649
Marblehead, MA
|
There is a discussion about spinnaker poles in another thread at at this link where Michael Lusty found in the 2004 rules the requirement for a bridle was added. In 2005 when the class rules were updated to allow carbon poles, the bridal requirement disappeared. Bob Rutsch commented that he did not know if this was intentional, or an inadvertent omission when the rules updates were made. Here are the applicable paragraphs from the 2004 and 2005 rules: 2004 Rules5.11 Spinnaker Pole .1 Material shall be of aluminum alloy extrusion and supplied only through a builder approved by the J/30 Class Association. .2 Length from tip to tip of the pole shall not exceed 3810 mm nor when attached to the fitting at the mast, extend more than 3842 mm from the face of the mast. .3 Bridle is required and the material is not restricted..4 Spinnaker pole end fittings can be of composite material such as the Forespar "ultra" series. A trigger mechanisms for holding the jaws open is not permitted.2005 Rules & as currently worded in 2009 Rules5.11 Spinnaker Pole .1 Material shall be of either aluminum alloy extrusion or carbon fiber. The diameter of the an aluminum spinnaker pole shall not be less than 2 7/8 inches and a carbon fiber spinnaker pole shall have a uniform diameter through out of not be less than 2 1/2 inches..2 Length from tip to tip of the pole shall not exceed 3810 mm nor when attached to the fitting at the mast, extend more than 3842 mm from the face of the mast. .3 Spinnaker pole end fittings can be of composite material such as the Forespar "ultra" series. A trigger mechanisms for holding the jaws open is not permitted. Would the class measurer please investigate this and report back here? If it was removed intentionally, then the case is closed. If it was inadvertently dropped during the 2005 rules update, we should restore the rule as intended during the next time the rules are updated. Umm... I bought a pole without a bridal - I checked the rules and noticed it was gone so I figured we had dropped it.
David Bows Mallorca - Hull# 397 ~~~~~_/)~_/)~~~~_/)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Upda
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#10417
10/29/10 09:08 AM
10/29/10 09:08 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 159 grand rapids, mi
311 Temptation
Western Great Lakes District Governor
|
Western Great Lakes District Governor
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 159
grand rapids, mi
|
You will snap your pole quickly. Surely not made for use like that.
Normal load in column versus the point load...
To bypass bridles, connect the topping lift & downhaul shackles to the outboard pole ends, same place as the end of the bridles were connected. Once you get rid of your bridles you must dip jibe as you cannot end for end jibe without the bridles. I think the bridles, end for end jibes and single sheets are a total system very well suited to the J/30.
Dell Todd #311 Temptation Holland MI
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#10421
10/29/10 11:51 AM
10/29/10 11:51 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 675 Maryland, USA
Bob Rutsch
Governor at Large
|
Governor at Large
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 675
Maryland, USA
|
I concur with 311. The load applied by the foreguy attached at the center is likely to bend an aluminum pole. As noted in Carbon pole sizing I'd setup like Rhapsody with a bridle especially in breeze.
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: Bob Rutsch]
#10427
10/29/10 08:00 PM
10/29/10 08:00 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 649 Marblehead, MA
dbows
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 649
Marblehead, MA
|
My carbon pole has the d rings in the middle with no issue and we have had the chute up in 25+ with no flex. I highly doubt Forte would build a pole like this if it would not hold up. The pole is only 6 1/2 feet from the center - that would have to be a hell of a lot of load to snap off - particularly with the guy twinged down really hard.
The D rings are MUCH easier to handle and the pole will stand up to anything we sail in week in and week out. I would never messing up that sexy carbon with an old school bridal (-:
DB
David Bows Mallorca - Hull# 397 ~~~~~_/)~_/)~~~~_/)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#10438
11/01/10 03:23 PM
11/01/10 03:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186 Barrington, RI
cstoddard
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Barrington, RI
|
Been watching this thread for a couple of days It is my recollection that the bridles were left off the 2004 rules by error aluminum poles will require bridles due the stress loads I think Carbon poles would be fine with a D ring when running down wind in the higher wind conditions but I would have concerns as to the loading when beam reaching. Tapered poles which our rules do not allow for are can be built with D rings. I will check with a couple of the pole manufacturers and get there views on the D rings for carbon poles
Trigger ends were not allowed due to the fact they are not retrofitable to the old poles.
Charlie Stoddard Falcon #229
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: sailon]
#11128
02/21/11 04:42 PM
02/21/11 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186 Barrington, RI
cstoddard
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Barrington, RI
|
I am in the process of reseaching the history on this and will have a ruling shortly
Charlie Class measurer
Charlie Stoddard Falcon #229
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: cstoddard]
#18985
04/25/22 05:22 PM
04/25/22 05:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88 Belmont, MA
Georges
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88
Belmont, MA
|
Thanks Charlie, Did you end-up with a ruling on this. I see that the bridle was added explicitly in 2004 - 5.11.3. Was removed in 2005 edition - and not figuring in the latest one from 2013.
I am planning to invest in a carbon pole, the 12.5' still sold by defender, but this one does not have a bridle. Want to check first if it is class legal....
Thanks!
-- Georges Foot Loose #467 - CPYC - Winthrop
|
|
|
Re: Spinnaker Pole Bridle Requirements dropped on 2005 Rules Update
[Re: Rhapsody #348]
#18987
04/25/22 09:10 PM
04/25/22 09:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88 Belmont, MA
Georges
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88
Belmont, MA
|
Thanks fort this quick answer Bill - much appreciated!
-- Georges Foot Loose #467 - CPYC - Winthrop
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
40
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|