|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Forums28
Topics4,036
Posts19,232
Members1,051
| |
Most Online438
Nov 14th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 883
J30.us
|
|
J30.us
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 883 |
TP-10 or TP-22 for a J/30 Autohelm?
Thanks!
David Erwin
dave@j30.us
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,681 Likes: 1
Past J/30 Class President
|
|
Past J/30 Class President
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,681 Likes: 1 |
You'll be much happier with the extra torque of the TP-22. The TP-10 will be ok for motoring but won't handle any unbalanced sail conditions. The TP-22 can also be driven by simnet or NMEA0183 if you want to integrate with instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 39
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 39 |
We went for the TP-32 when our old autohelm failed. As Bill mentioned, it also can be networked to an existing NMEA network.
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
16
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image]](https://j30.us/ubbthreads/gallery//vs-avatar.jpg){kind=avatar}
