|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Forums28
Topics4,053
Posts19,271
Members1,062
| |
Most Online1,565 May 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Forum Newbie
|
|
Forum Newbie
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5 |
I have owned hull #325 (WhatIf) for the last 4 years and have been racing in Corpus Christi Bay. Our new PHRF Committee decided to measure both of the J30's and found that both of us had poles that are J+1. I noticed that the US Sailing PHRF handicap book states that an overlength pole is standard on a J30. Than I look at the J30 website under PHRF ratings and see that the PHRF is based on a pole with a length of J and OD rating with J+1. How is this done if the oversize pole is standard on a J30? Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 493
Governor at Large
|
|
Governor at Large
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 493 |
First some history ... which may not be completely accurate, but just what I remember. If someone else has a different story, please correct me.
The reason for the J+1 pole goes back to SORC(?) back in 78(?). The Johnstones took their new J/30 down to Florida. The race was done under IOR. In testing before the regatta they decided they went upwind just fine, but were slower than they'd like going downwind with their frac chute. So, they used an oversized pole, which allowed a bigger spinnaker. With a bigger pole, IOR allowed them to use a larger genny without further penalty. This configuration became standard for OD.
So along comes PHRF. How do you rate this relatively odd duck? Most PHRF stations will try to get a rating for the OD J/30 (J+1 plus oversize genny). For a PHRF J/30 (J length pole, 155% jib), they'll apply their usual penalties as credits. Often that's 3 sec/mile for the pole, and 3 sec/mile for the genny.
So, on Lake Michigan, OD PHRF = 138, "PHRF" J/30 = 144.
As an aside, I'd like to add that the method of applying the penalties as credits is probably overly generous. A penalty is generally meant to discourage change, costs more than it's actually worth. The difference in speed between a 155% genny and the OD genny is less than 3 sec/mile. Having said that, I'm not about to change my OD J/30 to play a PHRF rating game.
Dennis Bartley Planxty, s/n 23994 hull 205
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 268
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 268 |
My boat came with both poles. And just to confuse matters the Carib has its own rating system; I found the optimum rating was to cut the longer pole 6 inches so I don't take the penalty. Seems to work out fine with the class legal (bigger)spinnaker, which does not take a penalty point. You also have to figure in the PHRF arbitrary factor...as in the rating on J30s in Key West... it gets even more annoying there. Just make the boat go fast and enjoy.
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
171
guests, and
1
robot. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|