|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Forums28
Topics4,054
Posts19,272
Members1,062
| |
Most Online1,909 Jul 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 49
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 49 |
Have Hull #139 and want to move to a wind ward sheeting system. I am looking at har1635 (Harken Midrange CB Windward Sheeting Traveler Car). Anyone made this change? Advice?
Thanks, Brett
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 186 |
its a great move but get the "long" car as it can handle the loads alot better
Charlie Stoddard Falcon #229
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 679
Governor at Large
|
|
Governor at Large
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 679 |
Long midrange car either 1636 with 'captive bearing' technology or the original 1576 if you already have the old style Harken track. Early hulls can use the low profile track, later models are better with the high profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 49
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 49 |
Interesting Response from Harken. Looks like I need a new track also...any alternatives?
"So that is not a Harken track so you will need to replace the track and car and everything. That appears to be a pretty narrow trough that the track sits down in. I agree a Midrange system is what I might recommend. Track would be a R27HB.?Length. Car would be a 1635 and the end controls would be a 1631. Have a look at this gear and let me know what you think. That 1635 car is 4 1/8" wide and the R27HB track is 1 5/8 tall. Thanks"
Rick Wilfert
Harken Inc.
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
137
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|