|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Forums28
Topics4,054
Posts19,272
Members1,062
| |
Most Online1,909 Jul 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Boat hull 184, vintage 1979 The prop is off balance, and the shaft got bent this fall. So upgrading to larger shaft and better prop once strut repaired.
The class rules read ".3 Propeller, shaft and strut shall be in accordance with the standard installation with a propeller diameter of not less than 356mm."
I am going to presume that the key item here is the 14" min size, but want to also know whether or not I can go to a feathering prop, as opposed to simple folding. I am also presuming that increasing shaft diameter is NOT an issue.
Any comments please? (before I spend the dollars)
Thanks
Roy
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 173
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 173 |
The early boats were sold with 3/4" shafts. Due to vibration, they changed the spec to 1" shafts in later boats. There is no issue with upgrading to a 1" shaft.
On the feathering prop issue, as far as I know it's not allowable under one-design rules. For an official ruling, you have to check with the class measurer Larry Christy. His email is alchristy@comcast.net
[This message has been edited by jmruzzi (edited 11-09-2003).]
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 67
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 67 |
I thought the upgrade was to a 7/8 inch shaft not one inch?
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
137
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|