|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Forums28
Topics4,054
Posts19,272
Members1,062
| |
Most Online1,909 Jul 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 40
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 40 |
Hi,
What is the optimum overall spinnaker pole length for PHRF (Lake Ontario)? Is it the J length of 11'6" rather than the classs maximum of 12'6"?
Related to that, does anyone have experience flying class spinnakers with the 11'6" pole? How much is performance affected?
Thanks for your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Generally with PHRF, the width of the spinnaker (SMW) is a function of pole length (SPL). 180% of SPL without a penalty. You really want to project the spinnaker out away from the boat as much as possible.
I've never really tried flying a class chute with a short pole. I 'spose it would work, but I don't know how efficient it would be.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 124
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 124 |
We've never tried it either, but given how much the J/30 likes to have the pole back, or even slightly oversquared, I'd think a short pole with the full sized kite isn't going to be pretty. Not so much of an issue reaching, but as you come down, I think you'd be losing a fair bit of projection.
- David
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You should talk to your Club's measurer.
The SPL and spinnaker girth measurments go hand in hand. The 180% max girth measuremnt is a multiple of the SPL.
If you shorten the pole without also cutting down all of your spinnakers there will be no benefit.
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
137
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|